Google and Meta get run as rivals and they're not. Meta makes somebody want the thing. Google is there when they go looking for it. Run one without the other and you either create demand you never collect, or you spend your way into a search term nobody is typing yet.

Nobody woke up looking for your product. The creative is what makes them care.
Your name, or the category. This is the moment Google exists for.
Search, Shopping and Performance Max, so the demand you paid to create lands.
Nobody on Meta woke up wanting your product. On Google they typed it in. That changes everything about the work: the job isn't to make somebody care, it's to be the obvious answer at the moment they already do, which is a feed and a landing page problem far more than a bidding one.
In Shopping and Performance Max the product feed is doing the work an ad does on Meta. Titles, images, attributes, the lot. Most accounts we open have a feed nobody has touched since the store was built, which caps everything above it however the campaigns are structured.
A big slice of most Google accounts is people typing your name, who were going to arrive anyway. It reports beautifully and proves nothing. We separate it out so the number you judge the channel on is the traffic it actually went and found.
Left alone it's a black box that spends most of its budget on the cheapest traffic it can find. Structured properly, with the feed sorted and branded terms handled, it's useful. The difference is entirely in the setup.
For most ecommerce brands at most stages, Meta is the bigger lever and Google is the one that stops the demand leaking. If you're choosing, start with the one that creates the want. If there's already search volume on your name and your category, Google is often the faster money and we'll say so.












A fractional creative strategist in your business, and the team that makes the work. For less than one hire.